2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1960 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 363 more horse power than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1960 Isuzu Minx.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 457 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (113 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Isuzu Minx. 2006 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1960 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1960 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Charger | 1960 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Dodge | Isuzu |
Model | Charger | Minx |
Year Released | 2006 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6063 cc | 1491 cc |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2440 mm |