2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 321 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1965 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1965 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Charger | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Charger | Elan |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6063 cc | 1558 cc |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 45 L |