2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1969 Renault 4
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Renault 4 would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 392 more horse power than 1969 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 4.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Charger | 1969 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Dodge | Renault |
| Model | Charger | 4 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6063 cc | 745 cc |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |
