2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1970 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP) has 372 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 477 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300. 2006 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1970 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1970 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Charger | 1970 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Dodge | Zastava |
Model | Charger | 1300 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
Engine Size | 6063 cc | 1295 cc |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 570 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2430 mm |