2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1971 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (340 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1403 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Charger | 1971 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Charger | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1971 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2210 mm |