2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1975 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (340 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 1975 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1975 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1863 kg more than 1975 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 487 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Charger | 1975 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Charger | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 5654 cc | 356 cc |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 42 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2020 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 30 L |
