2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (340 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1975 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1098 kg more than 1975 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Charger | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Charger | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |