2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1982 ZIL 4104
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,695 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1982 ZIL 4104. (311 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1982 ZIL 4104.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 ZIL 4104 (608 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Dodge Charger. (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1982 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Charger | 1982 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | Dodge | ZIL |
| Model | Charger | 4104 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6063 cc | 7695 cc |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 608 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2090 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3340 mm |
