2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1987 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 1987 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1987 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 483 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Fiat Ritmo. (87 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Charger | 1987 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Dodge | Fiat |
Model | Charger | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6063 cc | 1116 cc |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2460 mm |