2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1988 Holden Camira
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Holden Camira would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 310 more horse power than 1988 Holden Camira. (115 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1988 Holden Camira.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Holden Camira. (176 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Charger | 1988 Holden Camira | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Charger | Camira |
Year Released | 2006 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6063 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2580 mm |