2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1992 Fiat 126
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Fiat 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Fiat 126 would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 399 more horse power than 1992 Fiat 126. (26 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1992 Fiat 126.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 521 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Fiat 126. (49 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Fiat 126. 2006 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1992 Fiat 126 has manual transmission. 1992 Fiat 126 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Charger | 1992 Fiat 126 | |
Make | Dodge | Fiat |
Model | Charger | 126 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6063 cc | 703 cc |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 49 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 1850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |