2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1992 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 324 more horse power than 1992 Plymouth Voyager. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1992 Plymouth Voyager.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Voyager. (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Charger | 1992 Plymouth Voyager | |
Make | Dodge | Plymouth |
Model | Charger | Voyager |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6063 cc | 2501 cc |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2860 mm |