2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1994 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Charger | 1994 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Charger | Cougar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6063 cc | 3800 cc |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1860 mm |