2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. (238 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1996 Oldsmobile SS.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (380 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Dodge Charger. (339 Nm). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Charger | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
Model | Charger | SS |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3522 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 96.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 86.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |