2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1999 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 418 more horse power than 2006 Dodge Charger. (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2006 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Dodge Charger. (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1999 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Dodge Charger. 2006 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1999 Lotec C 1000 has manual transmission. 1999 Lotec C 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Charger | 1999 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotec |
| Model | Charger | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6063 cc | 5498 cc |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 843 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1150 mm |
