2006 Dodge Charger vs. 2001 Suzuki EV Sport
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki EV Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki EV Sport would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 299 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki EV Sport. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki EV Sport.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm) has 464 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki EV Sport. (106 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki EV Sport.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Charger | 2001 Suzuki EV Sport | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Charger | EV Sport |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6063 cc | 398 cc |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 126 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2240 mm |
