2006 Dodge Charger vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP) has 270 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Charger | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercury |
| Model | Charger | Sable |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6063 cc | 2983 cc |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 155 HP |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 68 L |
