2006 Dodge Charger vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (340 HP) has 192 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (529 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Charger | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Charger | Epica |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
