2006 Dodge Dakota vs. 1982 Ford Monarch
To start off, 2006 Dodge Dakota is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 309 kg more than 1982 Ford Monarch.
Because 2006 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Monarch. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Dakota | 1982 Ford Monarch | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Dakota | Monarch |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3703 cc | 4122 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1769 kg | 1460 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2800 mm |
