2006 Dodge Dakota vs. 1995 Rover 400
To start off, 2006 Dodge Dakota is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 400 would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1995 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 400.
Because 2006 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Dakota | 1995 Rover 400 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Dakota | 400 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3703 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2560 mm |