2006 Dodge Dakota vs. 1998 Rover 420
To start off, 2006 Dodge Dakota is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 420. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 420 would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 580 kg more than 1998 Rover 420. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Rover 420. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 420. (184 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 420.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Dakota | 1998 Rover 420 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Dakota | 420 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3703 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1769 kg | 1189 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2750 mm |