2006 Dodge Durango vs. 1962 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2006 Dodge Durango is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 4,702 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2006 Dodge Durango. (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2006 Dodge Durango. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 146 kg more than 2006 Dodge Durango. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Jaguar MK X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Durango (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jaguar MK X. (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jaguar MK X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Durango | 1962 Jaguar MK X | |
| Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
| Model | Durango | MK X |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4702 cc | 3781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1896 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 90 L |
