2006 Dodge Durango vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Dodge Durango is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Durango weights approximately 861 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Durango | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
Model | Durango | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 1482 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2760 mm |