2006 Dodge Durango vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Dodge Durango is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Durango weights approximately 953 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Durango | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
Model | Durango | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2279 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2680 mm |