2006 Dodge Durango vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 2006 Dodge Durango is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2006 Dodge Durango. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 2006 Dodge Durango.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Dodge Durango. (320 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Dodge Durango.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Durango | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Durango | Etna |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3704 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 331 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 408 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2520 mm |
