2006 Dodge Durango vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Dodge Durango is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Durango (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1259 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Durango (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Durango | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Dodge | Renault |
| Model | Durango | Clio |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2279 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.2 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 50 L |
