2006 Dodge Durango vs. 2010 BMW 328
To start off, 2010 BMW 328 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Durango would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 230 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Durango weights approximately 718 kg more than 2010 BMW 328.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Durango (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 328. (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Durango | 2010 BMW 328 | |
Make | Dodge | BMW |
Model | Durango | 328 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1369 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2761 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 61 L |