2006 Dodge Durango vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Durango would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1014 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 2006 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Cooper. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Durango (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Durango | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Dodge | Mini |
Model | Durango | Cooper |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2279 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.2 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 50 L |