2006 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Grand Caravan (180 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Grand Caravan should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Dodge Grand Caravan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Grand Caravan | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Grand Caravan | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3310 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4690 mm |
