2006 Dodge Magnum vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Magnum. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Magnum would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Magnum is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Magnum (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Magnum should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Magnum weights approximately 1128 kg more than 2009 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Magnum is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Magnum will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Magnum (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Magnum will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Magnum | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Magnum | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 55 L |