2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (235 HP) has 186 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (407 Nm) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Cortina |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 90 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |