2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1964 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 462 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1881 kg more than 1964 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 1964 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Ram | Seven |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8276 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2313 kg | 432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 29 L |