2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1972 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Dodge Ram. (345 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2006 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1383 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 424 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Ram | 1972 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Ram | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2420 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 125 L |
