2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1974 Mazda 929
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 699 kg more than 1974 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 1974 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | 929 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1769 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2050 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |