2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 225 kg more than 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Ram | 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Dodge | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ram | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 2118 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 107 L |
