2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 456 kg more than 2006 Dodge Ram.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Ram | 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Dodge | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ram | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2206 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6300 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 107 L |
