2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1982 Mazda 626
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 724 kg more than 1982 Mazda 626.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Mazda 626 has automatic transmission and 2006 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 2006 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Mazda 626 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Ram | 1982 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Ram | 626 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1769 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2050 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2520 mm |
