2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1983 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1322 kg more than 1983 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Ram | 1983 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Dodge | Plymouth |
| Model | Ram | Reliant |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8276 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2472 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2260 mm |
