2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1992 Mercury Tracer
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 5,881 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (325 HP @ 2900 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1992 Mercury Tracer. (127 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1992 Mercury Tracer.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (827 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 673 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mercury Tracer. (154 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 1992 Mercury Tracer | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Ram | Tracer |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5881 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 2900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 827 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 6300 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2510 mm |