2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1994 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Renault Clio would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 441 more horse power than 1994 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1994 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1458 kg more than 1994 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (713 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 628 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Renault Clio. (85 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 1994 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Ram | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8276 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 713 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 75.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 64.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2313 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 38 L |