2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura CL would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (500 HP) has 355 more horse power than 1997 Acura CL. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 892 kg more than 1997 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Dodge | Acura |
Model | Ram | CL |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8276 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2472 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 65 L |