2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (346 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer. (280 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 158 kg more than 2006 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer. (372 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ram | Lancer |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 509 Nm | 372 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1908 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6300 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2610 mm |