2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura CL would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (345 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1998 Acura CL. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 763 kg more than 1998 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Acura CL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 1998 Acura CL | |
Make | Dodge | Acura |
Model | Ram | CL |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1990 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |