2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1998 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (216 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 323. (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 1998 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 109 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |