2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1647 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Rover Mini. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 1998 Rover Mini | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Ram | Mini |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 94 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 696 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2750 mm |