2006 Dodge Ram vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer. (373 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ram | Lancer |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 1 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2520 mm |