2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2006 Dodge Ram. (346 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 2006 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 50 kg more than 2006 Dodge Ram. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar XKA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Dodge Ram. (509 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Ram | XKA |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 4399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 466 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 843 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2590 mm |