2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (346 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 690 kg more than 2006 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. (439 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
Model | Ram | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 509 Nm | 439 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6300 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2550 mm |