2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (216 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (78 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Ram | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 18.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |