2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (216 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Dodge Ram. (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Econoline |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 3510 mm |